“Make time go slow.” At SPARC 2025, life was moving too fast. There was always something fun to do, and a distraction was always there if I wanted it. So this piece of advice during the class we had on meditation felt perfectly timed. The next day, instead of going to class, I took a walk along the cliffside and just sat there. I sat there staring, letting my existence sink in. Writing this blog is probably the slowest my life has been in the past month, and it started with me letting my existence sink in (my roommate will tell you I spent a lot of today just staring at our ceiling). But even now, I have to intentionally move slowly, to prevent myself from joining the ping pong games running outside or the groups of people going to parties outside my window. Once I stopped filling every moment, I started noticing the things I kept saying I wanted to do but never made time for. When I talked to my friend about lacking motivation to do things that actually improve me, a piece of adv...
I don’t have many long stretches of time where someone doesn’t mention the existential crisis that many people in intellectual fields are going through: whether AI will take their jobs or not. And what's crazy to me is how dystopian these people make the future out to be. I think that even if we extrapolate timelines based on current rates of progress, there’s still so many interesting problems that will need to be solved post-AI. At the highest level, I don’t believe AI is the last “big” thing. Problems like inference, robotics, energy, or even world hunger will persist, and will require significant innovations beyond the current state-of-the-art systems. AI is currently, and has been, really really good at solving well-defined problems in the digital world, but as soon a problem does not satisfy these two properties, AI falls flat. At a slightly more controversial level, the thing that these models are optimizing for does not make them capable of solving problems in the real worl...